While considering frameworks, it’s crucial to know the competitive strength of a vendor in the extremely areas of zero-trust. A track record of continuous innovation in passwordless and sophisticated authentication technologies, as well as the continuous development of encryption algorithms, are good metrics to apply to any zero-trust security provider that a business may choose to engage with.
Zero-trust as a model for safeguarding modern enterprises has been around for a while, but with the surge in cyberattacks, it’s gaining traction. The US government is pushing for zero trust deployment across all of its agencies, and more vendors are joining the already crowded zero-trust product market.
Zero-trust frameworks are particularly challenging to evaluate due to the mix of user requirement and vendor hype. Is a given zero-trust system capable of withstanding scrutiny? Before making a purchasing decision, buyers must create and test an impartial, balanced set of complex criteria.
Scalability, least-privileged access and advanced patch management are a few factors to consider. Buyers must be prepared to analyze the success of AI software as application discovery and automated AI-based network gains momentum.
Also Read: Top Three Strategies For Successfully Implementing Zero-Trust in IoT Security
Zero-trust and hype
As per a recent ThycoticCentrify report, 77 percent of businesses have already implemented a zero-trust strategy in their cybersecurity policy. “Reducing cyber threats” was the top reason for adoption for 42% of respondents. However, as businesses increase their investment in zero-trust, it’s critical to distinguish hype from results.
A thorough review of frameworks is an important approach that CISOs must adopt when they develop their cybersecurity strategies and architectures. The parameters listed below aid in identifying cybersecurity suppliers capable of delivering a good zero-trust architecture today.
Scalability
The ability of a zero-trust solution to scale from defending SMBs to large-scale enterprises is determined by how well its architecture is structured to adapt to the changing needs of an organization.
Zero-trust solutions that have been proven to succeed can safeguard a remote office, a regional hub of offices, or an entire enterprise. Securing SMBs, which frequently function as independent partners to larger organizations, is, however, sometimes disregarded.
Security policy enforcement must happen at the edge, where people, apps, devices, and workloads interact, for any zero-trust solution to scale and safeguard SMBs with the same level of security as enterprises. Scalability also implies that the system should be transparent to users, allowing them to concentrate on their work rather than trying to figure out security.
Furthermore, the system must be straightforward to activate, scale, and alter as the needs of an organization change. Furthermore, scalability necessitates the use of a fully integrated, no-cost identity access management platform which could be used with any authentication provider.
IT asset tracking and endpoint security
Assessing zero-trust providers’ innovations, their capacity to go beyond the fundamentals of endpoint security and deliver more robust, resilient, and self-healing endpoints is something that has to be addressed. Self-healing endpoints are attracting the interest of private equity firms, and early-stage investors, as their sales have the potential to outperform the overall cybersecurity market.
Endpoints that require self-healing apps, security agents or clients, firmware, or operating systems must be detected in a more automated way. Greater visibility and control across OT and IT systems would benefit any company. Leading zero-trust vendors will be able to provide references demonstrating their ability to give IT and OT insights.
Also Read: Strengthening security profiles by improving zero-trust architecture
Real-time insights and visibility
A cybersecurity vendor must offer one or more methods for gaining real-time insights and visibility across all endpoint devices, assets, and data repositories in order to excel at delivering a zero-trust solution. Every endpoint should be secured by identifying and isolating rogue devices.
Using this parameter to evaluate potential zero-trust providers will swiftly identify those who are already engaged in active R&D and pushing the boundaries of AI, machine learning, and similar advanced analytics functions from those who aren’t.
Zero-trust providers who invest more money on R&D to automate network discovery and streamline procedures are setting the pace for innovation. As a suitable key criterion, companies could look for AI-based zero-trust platforms and apps with customer references.
For more such updates follow us on Google News ITsecuritywire News.
